Most guides to the National Human Rights Commission and State Human Rights Commissions stop the moment your complaint is submitted. They tell you which form to fill and where to send it, then go quiet on what happens next. That gap is exactly where citizens lose the most time.
This guide covers both halves: how to actually file with NHRC or an SHRC, and — based on a real, verified case from Tamil Nadu — what the months after filing actually look like. If you’re dealing with police inaction, custodial mistreatment, or a public official ignoring your rights, this is the practical version of the process, not the brochure version.
Key Takeaways
• NHRC received 76,891 complaints and disposed of 73,958 in 2023-24, awarding over ₹18.2 crore in compensation (NHRC Annual Report 2023-24, 2024).
• You generally have only one year from the incident to file — Section 36(2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act bars inquiry after that (ApniLaw, 2025).
• Only 26 of India’s states have a functioning SHRC — everyone else effectively falls back to NHRC.
• Real case data: a Tamil Nadu SHRC complaint led to a DSP enquiry with an 8-week reporting window, but the full process took 6 to 12 months end to end.
A human rights violation, in the legal sense used by NHRC and SHRCs, is an act or negligence by a public servant that infringes your basic rights — not any disagreement with a government decision (Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993). Custodial assault, illegal detention, denial of medical care in custody, and official negligence that causes harm all qualify.
It’s worth being blunt here: these commissions won’t touch a pure private dispute — a landlord-tenant fight or a business disagreement — unless a state actor failed to act on it. Isn’t that the first thing people get wrong? They assume “human rights” means any injustice. It means a public authority did something, or failed to do something, that violated a specific right.
Two things trip people up before they even file. First, the one-year limitation under Section 36(2) is strict — the Commission generally can’t inquire into anything older than that, though it has some discretion in exceptional cases. Second, understand what you’re filing with: a recommendatory body, not a court. It can direct enquiries and recommend compensation or action, but it cannot pass a binding criminal conviction the way a trial court can.
File with your State Human Rights Commission if the violation involves your state government or state police, and with NHRC if it involves central government bodies, spans multiple states, or your state has no functioning SHRC. Currently 26 states have set up an SHRC (PIB; Wikipedia) — everyone outside those states goes straight to NHRC.
Filing with the wrong commission doesn’t just get rejected outright; it commonly gets forwarded, and that forwarding step alone can cost you weeks or months before the right authority even starts looking at it. Getting this decision right on your first attempt matters more than almost anything else in this process.

You can file directly at the NHRC’s online complaint portal, and it costs nothing — the Commission does not charge any fee for registering a complaint, in English, Hindi, or any Eighth Schedule language (NHRC). The whole submission takes about 15-20 minutes if you have your facts organized beforehand.
Here’s the actual sequence:
Complainants who skip organizing their evidence before starting the form tend to submit thinner complaints — vague dates, no named officials — and thinner complaints take longer to act on because the Commission has to ask follow-up questions before it can even forward a proper notice.
For Tamil Nadu specifically, complaints go to the State Human Rights Commission at Thiruvarangam, 143, P.S. Kumarasamy Raja Salai (Greenways Road), Chennai 600028, and the Commission’s own procedure allows it to use central or state investigating agencies to inquire into the complaint (SHRC Tamil Nadu). A written complaint letter, addressed to the Registrar, works whether or not an online form is available at the time you file — check the current SHRC Tamil Nadu website for the live filing method, since state portals change.
Whatever your state, a complaint letter to any SHRC should include, in order:
The Act sets response timelines once the Commission does act: the concerned authority must indicate its comments or action taken within one month for general complaints and three months for complaints relating to specific matters (SHRC Tamil Nadu FAQ). Keep in mind that’s the timeline for the authority’s response to the Commission — not the total time to full resolution, which is usually longer, as the next section shows.
This is the part almost no guide covers with real numbers, so here it is, based directly on a verified complainant’s experience.
Verified complainant experience — Lokesh.R: “If a complaint is filed with SHRC Tamil Nadu, they will send the notice to the District Superintendent of Police and ask them to make an enquiry and submit the report within 8 weeks. Then the DSP will enquire into your issues. This process may take from 6 to 12 months.”
Walk through what that actually means in sequence:
Why the gap between an 8-week directive and a 6-12 month reality? The enquiry window applies to the DSP’s report — it doesn’t account for the Commission’s own review queue, requests for clarification, adjournments, or a second round of enquiry if the first report is incomplete. Set your expectations around the 6-12 month figure, not the 8-week one.
NHRC lets you check status online using your file number, diary number, complainant name, victim name, or incident date (NHRC) — that tool alone removes most of the guesswork for central complaints. Most SHRCs, Tamil Nadu included, don’t offer the same self-service tracking, so your follow-up has to be more deliberate.
For an SHRC complaint without online tracking, send a written follow-up letter that references your registration number directly — never a fresh, undated inquiry. If weeks pass with no reply at all, an RTI application to the Commission or the DSP’s office asking for the current enquiry status is a legitimate, effective fallback.
Timing your follow-up matters too. Don’t chase status within the first 8 weeks — that’s the DSP’s own reporting window, and a premature follow-up just adds noise without speeding anything up. The right moment to follow up is right after that window closes, when a report should exist even if the Commission hasn’t acted on it yet.
Keep a simple physical or digital folder with every acknowledgment, notice, and reference number the Commission sends you. You’ll need all of it if this ever needs to be escalated.
If the 8-week window closes with no report, or the Commission’s eventual decision doesn’t resolve the issue, escalate in this order: an RTI to get the report status, a written reminder addressed to the Commission’s Registrar, and — only as a last resort — a writ petition before the High Court. Escalation should be methodical, not immediate; jumping straight to court before exhausting the Commission’s own process rarely helps.
An RTI application to the DSP’s office is often the fastest way to find out whether the enquiry report was even submitted on time. If the Commission has gone quiet after receiving the report, a direct written reminder referencing your registration number, addressed to the Registrar or Secretary, is the appropriate next step — not a fresh complaint.
Legal recourse through a writ petition becomes realistic only when the Commission’s own channels have been exhausted and there’s still no meaningful action. And it’s worth resetting expectations here: even a favorable outcome from NHRC or an SHRC is typically a recommendation for compensation or departmental action — not a binding criminal verdict the way a court judgment is.
For more on this step, see our guide on escalating an unresolved government petition.
Five mistakes account for most of the unnecessary delay people run into:
Based on a real Tamil Nadu SHRC case, the DSP enquiry alone has an 8-week reporting window, but the full process — from filing to resolution — realistically takes 6 to 12 months. Timelines vary by state and case complexity, so treat this as a realistic baseline, not a guarantee.
No. NHRC does not charge any fee to register a complaint, and it accepts submissions in English, Hindi, or any language listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution (NHRC, 2026).
Yes — police-related complaints (custodial issues, illegal detention, inaction) are among the most common categories both NHRC and SHRCs handle. For state police matters, the Commission typically directs a District Superintendent of Police to conduct the enquiry and report back.
The Commission reviews the DSP’s findings and decides on further action, which can include recommending compensation, departmental proceedings, or closing the matter if no violation is established. This review stage has no fixed deadline, which is why total resolution time extends well beyond the 8-week enquiry window.
Yes. Complaints can be filed by the victim directly or by any other concerned person on the victim’s behalf — a common and accepted route when the victim cannot file themselves.
Filing with the right commission the first time, writing a complete and dated complaint, and setting your expectations around a realistic 6-12 month timeline are the three things that separate a smooth process from a frustrating one. Track proactively once the DSP’s 8-week window closes, and escalate methodically — RTI, then a written reminder, then legal recourse — rather than giving up early or jumping straight to court.
Browse more Government Petition Guides for step-by-step procedures on other departments and offices. If you’re dealing with a specific department or state authority not covered here, the same core principles — clear documentation, the right jurisdiction, and patient, methodical follow-up — apply across almost every government grievance-redressal process in India.
Hi, my name is Gowtham S. I am an environmental activist and ocean lover. I love to travel and write blogs.